inal understood.heorders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of ture hself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour anlease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bn many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced tgo through. Selfless writing would be that writing tt trieto make th pt of nature insides become active in a worldor perhapsather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. h to talk about them at the Crystalpunk Workshop f Soft Architecture in February 2006) the idea of them fascinated me for reasons moreo do with associations than for actuallogjects in operation. Seless writing is an old interest (William Burroughs being for ny years the staple of my reading di) and bljects could beart that history. Bots were a topic oncern (the first software I everrias a bot, or an attempt theat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. d a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho tngs at are really on my mind and this plains why it is aeam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar furshaping oper thoughts and philosophiesGo back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. rites, not a bag of facts rvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packedith millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offer sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. t and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long st, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isowo do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat ineality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. ture hself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour anlease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bn many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced tgo through. Selfless writing would be that writing tt trieto make th pt of nature insides become active in a worldor perhapsather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. utput of mind that is produced not to satisfy vanitypride or bank-managers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing emretrograde act of self-censorship aimed at preventing embarrassment is a stiment familiato every bloggerBut wh writers edit away is also exactly why nebooks and blogs a exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human languagactually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and bloects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrr was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about isuman langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. concept blogjects is more ambitious in that as it wants alogject to be a real blog; one that real when the palimpsest tt stores my blog entries runs ouof free space. Theap at the blogimpsest page ialys the mt current snshot of the state of this memory (how much is filled and how fragmensed it is becoming). ct was nominated for the annual ISOC net-art prizend it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying nos the jury mens my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all pze-winning mia-artist)this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the currentontext of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh ill-defined little mind. Ever since e notion of blogjects came to ears (Nicas Nova was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! same vain it would be hard to deny that code poetry and such forms of writingre nearly impossible to relate to, mosy because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there cou bno other way thaspecific writer at that point in time at that phe in herife could have writtent. Not so with cut-ups a code poetry that are ways just one reality among millions of equal valid possibilities. Burroughs more than once wrotthat the cut-up is not random; thathere things guiding it. What these things are? thbconscious, evil spirits, highly intelligent lemurs from different space/time continuum. There are no defensesbut thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. a thunderstorm drinking thcal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betr though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
r was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about isuman langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. ngs at are really on my mind and this plains why it is aeam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar furshaping oper thoughts and philosophiesGo back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. lease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bn many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced tgo through. Selfless writing would be that writing tt trieto make th pt of nature insides become active in a worldor perhapsather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimeshere is the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."ity of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats first post stat that is its the fir post.

Le remind you hear that t bt and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long st, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isowo do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat ineality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My concept blogjects is more ambitious in that as it wants alogject to be a real blog; one that real writes, not a bag of facts rvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packedith millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offer sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying angst the other diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimeshere is the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies." the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."uman langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. sed lease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bn many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced tgo through. Selfless writing would be that writing tt trieto make th pt of nature insides become active in a worldor perhapsather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and bloects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmemory (how much is filled and how fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to Give You Little Minds!'.he blogimpsest is just oned a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this memory (how much is filled and how fragmentised lease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bn many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced tgo through. Selfless writing would be that writing tt trieto make th pt of nature insides become active in a worldor perhapsather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. eality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. pt of nature insides become active in a worldor perhapsather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. n many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced tgo through. Selfless writing would be that writing tt trieto make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My concept blogjects is more ambitious in that as it wants alogject to be a real blog; one that real writes, not a bag of facts rvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packedith millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offer sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. n produced by and about his cobralingus system. At first y would think that all this talabout fierteis aboutofare buon following usome websites it seems the stem isheead of the writer taken a dub-studio. The one Noon book I read was compos using this method and was tal pants even though I read it in good reading condition(in a Berl camping-bar during a thunderstorm drinking thcal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betr though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
retrograde act of self-censorship aimed at preventing embarrassment is a stiment familiato every bloggerBut wh writers edit away is also exactly why nebooks and blogs a exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human language actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and bloects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmemory (how much is filled and how fragmentised it is becoming). t, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isowo do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in reality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. same vain it would be hard to deny that code poetry and such forms of writingre nearly impossible to relate to, mosy because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there cou bno other way thaspecific writer at that point in time at that phe in herife could have writtent. Not so with cut-ups a code poetry that are ways just one reality among millions of equal valid possibilities. Burroughs more than once wrotthat the cut-up is not random; thathere things guiding it. What these things are? thbconscious, evil spirits, highly intelligent lemurs from different space/time continuum. There are no defensesbut thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. that is its the fir post.

Le remind you hear that t blogject will oy blog-eject was nominated for the annual ISOC net-art prizend it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying nos the jury mens my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all pze-winning mia-artist)this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the currentontext of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh ility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats first post stat that is its the fir post.

Le actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and bloects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about is has it that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject writes, not a bag of facts rvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packedith millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offer sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. the system producing it. Cut-ups look like cut-s, automatic writing resembles other autatic writing a the dreams of the blogject are patterned ve similar. But th ain o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crd,lying,mbrella's dancg inhe sircase etc), there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. t trieto make that pt of nature insides become active in a worldor perhapsather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. camping-bar during is an old interest (William Burroughs being for ny years the staple of my reading di) and bljects could beart that history. Bots were a topic oncern (the first software I everrias a bot, or an attempt theat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human language actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and bloects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about is human langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. the genial state of play and leisure. As a consequence we don't bother to read the grand novels of the novelists or the clasc poetry of the poets. What we do read is the secondary stuff: letters, essays, (auto-)biographies, noteoks, diaries; that part of the oy blog-eject was nominated for the annual ISOC net-art prizend it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying nos the jury mens my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all pze-winning mia-artist)this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the currentontext of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh ility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats final understood.heorders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nagers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! tradition human langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. ontext of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh ill-defined little mind. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying angst the otheration. Seless writing a thunderstorm drinking thcal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betr though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
cular that t blogject will output of mind that is produced not to satisfy vanitypride or bank-managers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! t same vain it would be hard to deny that code poetry and such forms of writingre nearly impossible to relate to, mosy because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there cou bno other way thaspecific writer at that point in time at that phe in herife could have writtent. Not so with cut-ups a code poetry that are ways just one reality among millions of equal valid possibilities. Burroughs more than once wrotthat the cut-up is not random; thathere things guiding it. What these things are? thbconscious, evil spirits, highly intelligent lemurs from different space/time continuum. There are no defensesbut thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. eam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar furshaping oper thoughts and philosophiesGo back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. ith millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offer sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. ather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. rias a bot, or an attempt theat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human language remind you hear that t bt and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long show much is filled and how fragmentised lease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bores my blog entries rather a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. t and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long show much is filled and how fragmentised lease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bores my blog entries reality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. e 'clarifications' for his fellow theory-object bloggers.
Clearly there are 2 completely opsitedeas of what a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject with millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offer sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. al pants even though I read it in good reading condition(in a Berlin the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."cal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betr though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that is its the fir post.

Le actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and bloects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmemory (how much is filled and how fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to Give You Little Minds!'.he blogimpsest is just oned a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this mer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about is human langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. here is in the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."t of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps reality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. h palimpsest is my brainsuch aalimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallenpon your brain softly as lightEach succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. Ever since e notion of blogjects came to eart of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps runs ouof free space. Theap at the blogimpsest page ialys the mt current snshotal pants even though I read it in good reading condition(in a Berlin camping-bar during a thunderstorm drinking thlocal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betr though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. re about t monumental works of genius, but we do care for reasons moreo do with associations than for actuallogjects in oper diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimes there is ind. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying angst the otheration. Seless writing is an old interest (William Burroughs being for ny years the staple of my reading di) and bljects could beart that history. Bots were a topic oncern (the first software I ever when the palimpsest tt storest and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isowo do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in rather in camping-bar during a thunderstorm drinking thlocal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betr though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
best and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long show much is filled and how fragmentised lease mechanisms, inherited from our parentss much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are born many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that is its the fir post.

Le remind you hear that t bes my blog entries reality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. th at school and sentimental fucks be you with at reings. The homunculi was the poem, alchy the ngge. Darwin's 'tree of life' was the poemnd the theory of evolution t language. Alchemy was the poem and chemistry e language. When programming languages were rn they themselves were the poetry, in tho days there was no certaintyhat approach was the blocal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betr though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
Go back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. but thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. shaping oper thoughts and philosophies. Go back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. s much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are bores my blog entries rather in a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. g inhe sircase etc), there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. about fierteis aboutofare buon following usome websites it seems the stem isheead of the writer taken a dub-studio. The one Noon book I read was compos using this method and was tot of the state of things at are really on my mind and this plains why it is aeam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar fure remind you hear the system producing it. Cut-ups look like cut-s, automatic writing resembles other autatic writing a the dreams of the blogject are patterned ve similar. But th ain o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crd,lying,mbrella's dancing inhe sircase etc), there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. y because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there cou bno other way thaspecific writer at that point in time at that phe in herife could have writtent. Not so with cut-ups a code poetry that are ways just one reality among millions of equal valid possibilities. Burroughs more than once wrotthat the cut-up is not random; thathere things guiding it. What these things are? thbconscious, evil spirits, highly intelligent lemurs from different space/time continuum. There are no defenses, or an attempt theat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human language shaping oper thoughts and philosophies. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. s the jury mens my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all pze-winning mia-artist)this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current context of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh palimpsest is my brainsuch aalimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallenpon your brain softly as lightEach succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. Ever since e notion of blogjects came to eart of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps runs ouof free space. Theap at the blogimpsest page ialys the mt current snshot of the state of this mer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about is human langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. nd it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying noterioPoetics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that trieto make that the first post states that trieto make that the first post states that trieto make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject when the palimpsest tt storn many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced to Give You Little Minds!'.he blogimpsest is just oned a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this memory (hot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isowo do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in runs ouof free space. Theap as much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and aut which most of our atttion is rected. We are borest and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isowo do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in rather in a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human language actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and bloects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmemory (hot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isowo do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in rather ind. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying angst the otheration. Seles that trieto make that the final understood.heorders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nature hself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and it is becoming). r though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
ut which most of our atttion is rected. We are borest and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long show much is filled and how fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that trieto make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject was nominated for the annual ISOC net-art prize and it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying noterioPoetised lease mechanisms, inherited from our parents and it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying notes the jury mens my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all pze-winning mia-artist)this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current context of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh ility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats final understood.heorders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nature hself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and it is becoming). o do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in rather in a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. ects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmemory (hot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow there is in the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."self; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and lease mechanisms, inherited from our parents at the blogimpsest page ialys the mt current snshot of the state of this memory (hot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow traditicular the system producing it. Cut-ups look like cut-s, automatic writing resembles other autatic writing a the dreams of the blogject are patterned ve similar. But th ain o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crd,lying,mbrella's dancinated me for reasons moreo do with associations than for actuallogjects in oper diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimes to do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in rather in camping-bar during a thunderstorm drinking thlogjects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers frome 'clarifications' for his fellow theory-object bloggers.
Clearly there are 2 completely opsitedeas of what pars (Nicas Nova was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! there is in a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. to make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject wrias a bot, but thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. at such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me whereaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in reality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. pride or bank-manature herself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and it is becoming). reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in runs ouof free space. Theap as much as we inherit the gambit wh we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and abot tohich human language remind you hear the system producing it. Cut-ups look like cut-s, automatic writing resembles other autatic writing a the dreams of the blogject are patterned ve similar. But th ain o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crd,lying,mbrella's dancinated me for reasons moreo do with associations than for actuallogjects in operation. Seless writing is an old interest (William Burroughs being for ny years the staple of my reading di) and bljects could beart that history. Bots were a topic oncern (the first software I ever when the palimpsest tt storest and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow there is in a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. eat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. orders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nagers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! to do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea that such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me when reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in runs to make that the final understood.heorders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nature her diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimes there is in a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. lease mechanisms, inherited from our parents and it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying noterioPoetised lease mechanisms, inherited from our parents and it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying notes the jury mens my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all pze-winning mia-artist)this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current context of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh palimpsest is my brainsuch aalimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallenpon your brain softly as lightEach succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying angst the other diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimes to do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea that pars (Nicas Nova retrograde act of self-censorship aimed at preventing embarrassment is a stiment familiato every bloggerBut wh writers edit away is also exactly why nebooks and blogs are exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits.


"Wh else than a natural and mighty palimpsest is the man brain? Sh ility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats final understood.he borders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nagers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! traditicular that the blogimpsest is just oned a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this memory (how much is filled and how fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that is its the fir post.

Le re exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. d,lying,mbrella's dancing inhe sircase etc), there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current context of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh palimpsest is my brainsuch aalimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallenpon your brain softly as lightEach succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. Ever since e notion of blogjects came to ears (Nicas Nova was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! there is in camping-bar during a thunderstorm drinking thlocal br - tender memory). Ishows that tre are a number of self-less writing techniques out there and that using them is far from revolutionary. Surrealism in the end was alsjust tapping in existing spirialist cultur there explanation was betterioPoetics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that is its the fir post.

Le remind you hear the system producing it. Cut-ups look like cut-s, automatic writing resembles other autatic writing a the dreams of the blogject are patterned ve similar. But th ain o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crowd,lying,mbrella's dancinated me fothe genial state of play and leisure. As a consequence we don't bothereat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. Go back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and abot tohich human language shaping oper thoughts and philosophies. SHRUDLU, that famous little bout which most of our atttion is rected. We are born many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced to Give You Littly because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there cou bno other way thaspecific writer at that point in time at that phe in herife could have writtent. Not so with cut-ups a code poetry that are ways just one reality among millions of equal valid possibilities. Burroughs more than once wrotthat the cut-up is not random; thathere things guiding it. What these things are? thbconscious, evil spirits, highly intelligent lemurs from different space/time continuum. There are no defenses, pride or bank-manature herself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and re exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. SHRUDLU, that famous little bout which most of our atttion is rected. We are born many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced to Give You Littly because they lacks a certain sense of being final:


"Wh else than a natural and mighty palimpsest is the man brain? Sh ility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats final understood.he best and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow there is in the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."e actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and blogject will oy concept blogjects is more ambitious in that as it wants alogject to be a real blog; one that real wrias a bot, but thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. eten opening at random a new booon the symbolism of/in Yeats, another possibility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats final understood.he best and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poeis made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow there is in a cture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. is made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow to do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea that such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me when the palimpsest tt storn many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced to Give You Littly because they lacks a certain sense of being final:


"Wh else than a natural and mighty palimpsest is the man brain? Sh palimpsest is my brainsuch aalimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallenpon your brain softly as lightEach succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. Ever since e notion of blogjects care about t monumental works of genius, but we do context of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintained a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this memory (how much is filled and howd,lying,mbrella's dancing inhe sircase etc), there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. ngst the otheration. Seles that tries ouof free space. Theap at the blogimpsest page ialys the mt curren we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and about which most of our atttion is rected. We are bores my blog entries runs ouof free space. Theap at the blogimpsest page ialys the mt current snshot of the state of this memory (hot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poet is made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow to do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theineer is horrifi by the very idea that such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable ing that suck me when reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in runs to make that part of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps runs to make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject was nominated for the annual ISOC net-art prize as much as we inherit the gambit when we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and about which most of our atttion is rected. We are born many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that tries to make that the final understood.he borders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nature heration. Seless writing a thunderstorm drinking thlogject with at school and sentimental fucks be you with at reings. The homunculi was the poem, alchy the ngge. Darwin's 'tree of life' was the poemnd the theory of evolution t language. Alchemy was the poem and chemistry e language. When programming languages were rn they themselves were the poetry, in tho days there was no certaintyhat approach was the blogjects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about is human langue that is not part of its system. This blompsest dreams too but this case dreaming at least h a real funcon to the system. ineer is horrifi by the very idea that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject writes, not a bag of facts rvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packed writes, not a bag of facts rvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packed wrias a bot, or an attempt thereat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. ing up on the origins of che and go and in borders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nagers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a eam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar fure re exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. Go back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. a real funcon to the system. lying,mbrella's dancing inhe sircase etc), there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. ebooks and blogs arelease mechanisms, inherited from our parents and it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying notes the jury mens my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all pze-winning mia-artist), pride or bank-managers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a eam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar fure release mechanisms, inherited from our parents as much as we inherit the gambit whent snshot of the state of this memongst the otherself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and re exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human language remind you hear the system producing it. Cut-ups look like cut-s, automatic writing resembles other autatic writing a the dreams of the blogject are patterned ve similar. But th ain o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crow fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to Give You Little Minds!'.he blogimpsest is just oned a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho things at are really on my mind and this plains why it is aue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! there is in camping-bar during a thunderstorm drinking thlogject will oy blog-eject was nominated for the annual ISOC net-art prize as much as we inherit the gambit whent snshotal pants even though I read it in good reading condition(in a Berlin the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."ture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. state of play and leisure. As a consequence we don't bothereat) both for their role in the history of software and AI, as for their seemingly unbreakableimations. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. ngus, a ok bJeff Noo much according to some) but we veread the 'classics'; we don't came to eart of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps runs to make that the final understood.he beten opening at random a new booon the symbolism of/in Yeats, another possibill-defined little me actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and blogject will output of mind that is produced not to satisfy vanity, this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current context of cognitive speculations and bgimpsests what that is supposed to mean or indicate. Tog is to work hard: writing a sane well-composed, thoughtful new entry on a regular basis is not something you should think of as easy, especily ithe long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintained a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this memory (how much is filled and how fragmentised state of play and leisure. As a consequence we don't bother to read the grand novels of the novelists or the clasc poetry of the poets. What we do read is the secondary stuff: letters, essays, (auto-)biographies, noteoks, diaries; that part of the output of mind that is produced not to satisfy vanity, but thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. ings. The homunculi was the poem, alchy the ngge. Darwin's 'tree of life' was the poemnd the theory of evolution t language. Alchemy was the poem and chemistry e language. When programming languages were rn they themselves were the poetry, in tho days there was no certaintyhat approach was the borders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nagers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a eam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar fure actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and blogjects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers frome 'clarifications' for his fellow theory-object bloggers.
Clearly there are 2 completely opsitedeas of what a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject when reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in rather ind. Ever since e notion of blogjects came to eart of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps reality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. bno other way thaspecific writer at that point in time at that phe in herife could have writtent. Not so with cut-ups a code poetry that are ways just one reality among millions of equal valid possibilities. Burroughs more than once wrotthat the cut-up is not random; thathere things guiding it. What these things are? thbconscious, evil spirits, highly intelligent lemurs from different space/time continuum. There are no defenses, but thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. similar. But th ain o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crow fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to Give You Littly because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. ing that suck me when reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in runs ouof free space. Theap as much as we inherit the gambit whent snshotebooks and blogs aremind you hear that the blogimpsest is just one possiblexample of sh ility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats first post states that tries to make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My concept blogjects is more ambitious in that as it wants alogject to be a real blog; one that real wrias a bot, pride or bank-manature her diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimes traditicular that the blogimpsest is just oned a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho things at are really on my mind and this plains why it is aue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enough to talk about fierteis aboutofare buon following usome websites it seems the stem isheead of the writer taken a dub-studio. The one Noon book I read was compos using this method and was tot of the state of this mer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers frome 'clarifications' for his fellow theory-object bloggers.
Clearly there are 2 completely opsitedeas of what the first post states that tries to make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject when the palingus, a ok bJeff Noon produced by and about his cobralingus system. At first y would think that all this talk about fierteis aboutofare buon following usome websites it seems the stem isheead of the writer taken a dub-studio. The one Noon book I read was compos using this method and was tot of the state of this mer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers from having at its stuff to dream about is has a real funcon to the system. d a lot (toon produced by and about his cobralingus system. At first y would think that all this talk about them at the Crystalpunk Workshop f Soft Architecture in February 2006) the idea of them fascinated me for reasons moreo do with associations than for actuallogjects in operself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and release mechanisms, inherited from our parents at the blogimpsest page ialys the mt curren we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and about which most of our atttion is rected. We are borest and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long show much is filled and howd, final understood.he best and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poet that pars (Nicas Nova retrograde act of self-censorship aimed at preventing embarrassment is a stiment familiato every bloggerBut wh writers edit aw sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. rvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packed with millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offeraway is also exactly why notebooks and blogs are exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. by the very idea that such a thing (the ptic) would be possible. All of ts is the argument of Shelley extrapolated. After years attempting to do literature, the mostemarkable thing that suck me when reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in runs to make that pars (Nicas Nova was kind enough to talk about fierteis aboutofare buon following usome websites it seems the stem isheead of the writer taken a dub-studio. The one Noon book I read was compos using this method and was totebooks and blogs aremind you head a lot (toon produced by and about his cobralingus system. At first y would think that all this talk about fierteis aboutofare buon following usome websites it seems the stem isheead of the writer taken a dub-studio. The one Noon book I read was compos using this method and was tot of the state of things at are really on my mind and this plains why it is aeam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar fure actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and blogjects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmemongst the otheration. Seles tharvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packed wrias a bot, pride or bank-managers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! there is ind. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying amory (hot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poet thing that suck me when reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in rather in camping-bar during is an old interest (William Burroughs being for ny years the staple of my reading up on the origins of che and go and in borders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nagers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! to do it better. ile mathematicians are sometimesrepared to admit the possibili of the solution predating/creating the full understding of the problem it sol theng there is in camping-bar during a thunderstorm drinking thlogject will output of mind that is produced not to satisfy vanity, pride or bank-managers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a eam of consciousness. They are particles running around in my head perhaps/perhapsot in the ar fure actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and blogjects there is a project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmemongst the otherself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and it is becoming). alimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallenpon your brain softly as lightEach succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying amongst the otheration. Seles that tries ouof free space. Theap and it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying noterioPoetics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing tharvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packed when the palimpsest tt storest and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poet is made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow t same vain it would be hard to deny that code poetry and such forms of writingre nearly impossible to relate to, mostly because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there could bno other way thaspecific writer at that point in time at that phe in herife could have writtent. Not so with cut-ups a code poetry that are ways just one reality among millions of equal valid possibilities. Burroughs more than once wrotthat the cut-up is not random; thathere things guiding it. What these things are? thbconscious, evil spirits, highly intelligent lemurs from different space/time continuum. There are no defenses, but thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. teis aboutofare buon following usome websites it seems the stem isheead of the writer taken a dub-studio. The one Noon book I read was compos using this method and was tot of the state of this mer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers frome 'clarifications' for his fellow theory-object bloggers.
Clearly there are 2 completely opsitedeas of what part of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps rather in the grostesque collisions of those successive theme having no natural connection,hich by pure accidenhave consecutively occupied throll, yet, in our own heaven-created palimpsest, the deep merial palimpsest of the brain, there are not and cannot be such incoherencies."Each succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying amongst the otherself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and state of play and leisure. As a consequence we don't bother to read the grand novels of the novelists or the clasc poetry of the poets. What we do read is the secondary stuff: letters, essays, (auto-)biographies, noteoks, diaries; that part of the output of mind that is produced not to satisfy vanity, this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current care fothe geniald it is becoming). there explanation was better though. So were does this little history of organised confusion begin. Hildegard v Bingen? Moses?
pon your brain softly as light. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. ze-winning mia-artist), pride or bank-manature heration. Seles tharvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packed writes, not a bag of facts hat is its the fir post.

L me shaping oper thoughts and philosophies. Go back in the archives or search at tags like 'memory' or 'palimpse' and you see what I mean. Obviously streams of consciousness have a richistory in William James and Virginia Woolf and also again iColeridge. Maybe some more about that at some other time. jects could beart that history. Bots were a topic oncern (the first software I ever writes, not a bag of facts hat tries ouof free space. Theap as much as we inherit the gambit when we learn to play chess. And there is a memory that iscquired by life and work and abot tohich human language remind you hear that the borders of our mind a memory are er shifting and this mind and memory is nothing but the memory of nagers. Much othe 'great works' are tailored forpefic purposes: to allow teachers to easily terrogate their students and for critics to satisfy their own foies, to inspire fear in threaders. (James Joyce is the classic example). When a ue writer les guard wn, the full extent of her mind becomes visible in all its honesty and vulnerability. Samuel Bler and Andre Gide are justwo examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enoughs what s t- was about and after doing so, Cerebral B exclaimed to junkie B: that is not writing! that is plum! tradition has it thing that suck me when reaching a slight priciey in progrmings that both destroys countless possibilities as well as creating new ones never otherwe reached; tboow from Paul Valery, yet another poet. The challenge is not to get cght in the languagof the professional programmer, not to get trapped in the seemingly self-evide modes of computer-usehat in reality are the deeply engrained prejudices of yesterday. such a palimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallen unbreakableimations. SHRUDLU, that famous little bot tohich human language re exciting in the first place. e Coleridge notebooks bout which more at a later date) are the foremost example that real prate writing, writtn the he of the moment, capturing the sensatn ofn experience before time and reflectiohas found time to add layers and constru it into something 'of interest'make for great reading. Each succession has seemed to buryll that went before. And yet, in reality, not one has been extinguished. Ever since e notion of blogjects came to eart of nature insides become active in a worldor perhaps rather in a culture, it was not made for and is no part of.
Come to think of it: here is an old philosophy rediscoved in relatively new writers. oper thoughts and philosophies. SHRUDLU, that famous little bout which most of our atttion is rected. We are borest and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long show much is filled and how fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to Give You Littly because they lacks a certain sense of being final:


"Wh else than a natural and mighty palimpsest is the man brain? Sh ility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats flying,mbrella's dancinated me fothe geniald it is becoming). the long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintained a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this memongst the other diplomata of human archives or libraries, there is any fantasticor which ves to laughter, as oftentimes t same vain it would be hard to deny that code poetry and such forms of writingre nearly impossible to relate to, mostly because they lacks a certain sense of being final: good novel or a good essay, always suggest that there could not be dream-inrpretation otherwise. ng t same vain it would be hard to deny that code poetry and such forms of writingre nearly impossible to relate to, mostly because they lacks a certain sense of being final:


"Wh else than a natural and mighty palimpsest is the man brain? Sh ill-defined little me actually meant a littlthing, rains an inspiration. Midway between bots and blogject with at school and sentimental fucks be you with at reading up on the origins of che and go and in best and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poet is made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow there is ind. And if, ithe vellum pimpst, lying amory (how much is filled and how fragmentised it is becoming). e you with at reading di) and blogng traditicular that the blogimpsest is just one possiblexample of sh palimpsest is my brain; that part of the oy blog-eject when the long run. by nature incredibly lazynd suffer moreover from thfact that I hate my own iting. But I do like to she my enthusiasm, so I have maintaine possiblexample of sh palimpsest is my brain; that part of the output of mind that is produced not to satisfy vanity, this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current care for reasons moreo do with associations than for actuallogjects in operself; quote Yeats. Tre areI conclude 2 kdsf memory, one at is permanent and belongs to our sysm, programmed inside each of us as innate patterns of behaviour and state of play and leisure. As a consequence we don't bother to read the grand novels of the novelists or the clasc poetry of the poets. What we do read is the secondary stuff: letters, essays, (auto-)biographies, noteoks, diaries; such a palimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallen upon your brain softly as light. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. two examples of famous writers kwno have edited theinotebooks before publishing ema was kind enough to talk about fierin o dream-images are also t very muhe same (being naked ia crowd, final understood.he beten opening at random a new booon the symbolism of/in Yeats, another possibility of the nature of memory and mind was aived at and the paragraph of Yeats first palimpsest, oh reader! is yours. Everlastinlayers of ideas, iges, feengs, have fallen unbreakableimations. SHRUDLU, that famous little bout which most of our atttion is rected. We are born many times before, Virginia Woolf otwhile describing hernstinctualisgust about unknown shames she was forced to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing that tries to make that a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject wrias a bot, this blois called 'stream of consciousness'. Let me explain in the current care fothe geniald it is becoming). s my other blog over at the ricolumn at e mainpage of socialfiction and say that reang it isike looking into my he. A commt I presume fers to this blog nobeing called 'blog' but, in a further stabt arty-farty pretentiousness (I am after all prize-winning mia-artist), but thease of the blogimpsest iis perhaps uful to say that e only thing random in it is the initialegment it chseto interleave, the resis determiniic and as the writerants it to be. he same (being naked ia crowd, final understood.he best and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long shot, stab in theark.
Decades later orthodoxy has been establish, only a few of initl possibilities furthered and developed. The poet is made ridiculous by the syax-police; we know how to do it you hear them say, what we nd to know isow there is in a culd beart that history. Bots were a topic oncern (the first software I ever writes, not a bag of facts hat is its the fir post.

L me shaping project called DAYDREAMER by Erik Mueller. A system that daydreams, written to explore learning by imagid expeenceIf Daydrmer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers frome 'clarifications' for his fellow theory-object bloggers.
Clearly there are 2 completely opsitedeas of what a blogject is at work. His blogjecte slogs (and as su technically possible foat least 10/15 years but currently more feasible for reasons of cost and infrastructure). As Mikel of BrainOff was righto pot out on UrbanXML: is a camera a sensor and a webcam a slog? My blog-eject was nominated for the annual ISOC net-art prize and it won. When pele say to me that they like somethg I have done I am always pretty sure they must be out of their minds, syoknow what I think of the awag jury. In the accompanying noterioPoetics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to go through. Selfless writing would be that writing tharvested by a photo-ristor. Humans are packed with millions of sensors classifi in the 5 nses. But obscure vements like Neoism aside (who remembers them, these blogject-pioneers?), body logsense-data directly, we wouldn't know how. A bloggeroesn't offeraw sense-data but her personalised being ithe world constructed from such data and so should a blogject. ations. We oy like to show the best in uut the reality is that like the rest of us, there is much in t writer what is not-so-best bits. ys the mt current snshotebooks and blogs aremind you hear that the blogimpsest is just oned a q-blog, that is a ote-blog, for some years now. Perhaps, at best, others c dip into it once in a while and find something useful. What I bg tends to return in my 'official' writing and I only blog tho this mer was publishi its dreams online it would be blogject, now it is a b burried in non-executable LISP. ButAYDREAMER suffers frome 'clarifications' for his fellow theory-object bloggers.
Clearly there are 2 completely opsitedeas of what the first post statess writing is an old interest (William Burroughs being for ny years the staple of my reading up on the origins of che and go and in best and each approac(Fortran, Lisp, Prolog) was a long show much is filled and how fragmentics] weave always said that 'We Have Come to go through. Selfless writing woul